Field notes: Budgeting while the ship is sinking
At last night's school board budget ?workshop? I felt the sinking sensation that passengers on the Titanic must have felt:??it's too late for life boats. The trouble is, I felt that way last year as well.??The big difference between the Titanic and my school district is this: our ship doesn't really sink and we don't change directions.? What happened between last year's iceberg strike and this year's?? Nothing.? We threw a bunch of people overboard and kept on sailing ? and we'll do the same this year.?? No offense to Mike and my Stretching the School Dollar colleagues at Fordham, but out here in the trenches, it's budgeting as usual, which means politics as usual, which means balancing layoffs and tax increases, which means: the education equivalent of fighting over the deck chairs.
Last night, for instance,?with the administration suggesting that we lay off 10% of our teaching staff (but only 3% of the aides and no one from Central Administration), we heard impassioned speeches from two nurses, who knew their positions are not ?mandated? and thus vulnerable.? Individual teachers have lobbied me to save their jobs or their program, but no teachers spoke last night because we are in the middle of contract negotiations -- and I can't talk about that.? (I once suggested these public union contracts?be negotiated in public, an idea that was greeted with as much enthusiasm as if I'd suggested a class field trip to Mars.) Why aren't vocational teaching jobs on the line? a parent asked. Or Special Ed teachers?? What about our AP courses? ?Why do we have so many buses with just a few kids on them?? Why isn't sports on the chopping block??????
There were lots of ?hums and hahs and?promises that "we're doing the best we can," but the question is this: why are we having these conversations in March, just a month before we have to present the budget to the voters? As much as I admire the civic engagement of these lobbying efforts, they are disputes about the deck chairs, not which way to steer the ship. (In fact, most of the 40 people who came to the meeting last night wanted to talk about changing the graduation date and the condition of the baseball field!) My theory?? Years of being on the dole ? our district receives over 50% of its revenues from the state ? has made us good victims and better beggars.? The only proactive measure suggested last night was to organize students and parents to contact our legislators and ask for more money.
What is interesting to ponder here is what this bubble battle means to the very different governance directions the country's public schools are headed in: ?more centralization (ostensibly, for efficiencies of scale) and more school-level control (the charter school movement has lead the way here).? Stay tuned.?
--Peter Meyer, Bernard Lee Schwartz Policy Fellow
Category: School Finance
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Editor
Peter Meyer is an adjunct fellow with the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Since 1991, Meyer has focused his attentions on education reform in the United States, an interest joined while writing a profile of education reformer E.D. Hirsch for Life. Meyer subsequently helped found a charter school, served on his local Board of Education (twice) and, for the last eight years, has been an editor at Education Next.
May 16, 2013
Sign Up for updates from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute
- Daniel Willingham: Science and Education Blog
- National School Board Association’s School Board News Today
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices
- Texas Association of School Boards
- New York State School Board Association
- Florida School Boards Association
- California School Boards Association
- Program on Education Policy and Governance
- The Center for Research on Education Outcomes