« Back to Choice Words
Georgia House passes measure to test the “134-year-old status quo”
The Georgia House this week took another step toward exiling last spring’s state Supreme Court decision prohibiting the state approval of charter schools to the history books, where it belongs. If the Georgia Senate follows suit, voters will have an opportunity in November to test whether Chief Justice Carol Hunstein was correct in her assertion that Georgia citizens are happy to secure “the now 134-year-old status quo.”
In May, Georgia’s highest court disbanded the state’s charter school authorizing commission, ruling that no publicly funded educational enterprise is permissible unless first engineered or christened by a local school board. A resolution that passed a supermajority vote in the House on Wednesday would ask voters to reinstate the commission by amending the constitution. This is significant, as Hunstein proclaimed that the constitution limits authority over public education “to that level of government closest and most responsive to the taxpayers and parents of the children being educated.”
This resolution puts authority squarely in the hands of the taxpayer.
This resolution puts authority squarely in the hands of the taxpayer and recognizes that nothing is more responsive or consequential to a child’s education than the choice the parent makes on his behalf. The commission created 16 charter schools before the court ruled it did so in violation of the constitution, but the commission merely provided families the lever to make the educational decision themselves.
It’s true, as Hunstein notes, that Georgia voters last approved the constitution in 1983 – nine years before the nation saw the first charter school open in Minnesota and 10 years before the Georgia Legislature established its first charter law. It is nonsense to assume these same voters would have forever favored a scheme limiting their public education options only to those hatched by local government.
You don’t have to be a libertarian to see the value of an independent commission that authorizes more school choices for parents to consider. But a 4-3 majority of the Georgia Supreme Court believed that the commission is only an attempt by the state to compete with the principal of local control. That’s an antiquated constitutional test that would likely vanquish many 21st-century attempts to meet the individual needs of students.
Category: Charters & Choice
blog comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to Choice Words
Our Blogs
- Flypaper
- Stretching the School Dollar
- Common Core Watch
- Ohio Gadfly Daily
- Board's Eye View
- Choice Words
About the Editor
Adam Emerson
Director, Program on Parental Choice
Adam Emerson is the Thomas B. Fordham Institute’s school choice czar, directing the Institute’s policy program on parental choice and editing the Choice Words blog. He coordinates the Institute’s school choice-related research projects, policy analyses and commentaries on issues that include charter schools and public school choice along with school vouchers, homeschooling and digital learning.
Sign Up for updates from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Blogroll
- Charters & Choice
- Choice Media.TV
- Dropout Nation
- Ed is Watching
- Education Next
- Eduwonk
- Getting Smart
- Gotham Schools
- The Hechinger Report
- Jay P. Greene’s Blog
- Joanne Jacobs
- National Journal Education Experts
- The Quick and the Ed
- redefinED
- Rick Hess Straight Up
- Sara Mead’s Policy Notebook
- Whitney Tilson’s School Reform Blog

