« Back to Flypaper

CT learns the wrong lesson

 

This article is the reason I continue to hammer that states need to worry about reform substance not union support when crafting round two RTT applications.

Reading this, you'd think that the reason Connecticut lost in round one was because it had insufficient stakeholder buy-in. The truth is CT had among the worst proposals I've seen. It was weak from top to bottom, especially in the key section on teacher reform.

If CT roped in all of its districts and unions, it might collect another 20 points or so.

But it lost a total of 155 points.

If CT wants to win, it needs to get bold not acquiescent.

--Andy Smarick

Category: Ohio Policy


blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe to Flypaper

Our Blogs

About the Editor

Michael J. Petrilli
Executive Vice President

Mike Petrilli is one of the nation's foremost education analysts. As executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, he oversees the organization's research projects and publications and contributes to the Flypaper blog and weekly Education Gadfly newsletter.

Read More

Recent Tweets

Education Gadfly Weekly

June 13, 2013

  

Please leave this field empty

Archives