« Back to Flypaper
A little context on racial disparities in suspension rates
The Civil Rights Project is getting a ton of press attention for its new report finding that black students—and especially black students with disabilities—are suspended at much higher rates than their peers. But does that mean that our public schools—and the people working in them—are racist?
The study found that black students were 3.4 times as likely to be suspended as white students. That’s a lot! But consider this: Black adults are 5.8 times as likely to be in prison as whites. Suddenly the suspension rate doesn’t look so bad.
Now, you can make a case that our justice system is racist, too, and that’s why there are so many more blacks behind bars than whites. But even if that’s the case, nobody would argue that eliminating racism would remove the disparity entirely. We understand that all manner of social pathologies—poverty, single parenthood, addiction, etc.—impact the black community disproportionately. Turning that situation around is the focus of many school reformers and other social entrepreneurs. But in the meantime, we understand that those pathologies are going to lead to higher levels of crime in the black community.
So it is with school discipline. Considering what many poor, black children are up against, is it really hard to believe that they might be 3.4 times more likely to commit infractions that carry a penalty of suspension from school?
The outrage isn’t that these kids are getting suspended; it’s that they are ending up in special education in the first place.
As for the students-with-disabilities data, this almost surely relates to the use (or misuse) of the “emotional/behavioral disability” category. By definition, students so labeled are more likely to act out, defy adults, get into fights, and so forth. If anything, what these data illustrate is that many schools are dumping kids with discipline problems into special education, whether they have a “disability” or not. The outrage isn’t that these kids are getting suspended; it’s that they are ending up in special education in the first place, which is often a road to nowhere.
It’s fine for the Civil Rights Project to publicize these data. But to insinuate* that they show our schools to be racist is simply irresponsible, and probably untrue.
* UPDATE: As Kevin Carey pointed out to me, the report admits that the data do not "provide clear answers" to the question, "are blacks and others misbehaving more or experiencing discrimination?" So it was unfair for me to charge the authors of the report with insinuating that our schools are racist.
Category:
blog comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to Flypaper
Our Blogs
About the Editor
Michael J. Petrilli
Executive Vice President
Mike Petrilli is one of the nation's foremost education analysts. As executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, he oversees the organization's research projects and publications and contributes to the Flypaper blog and weekly Education Gadfly newsletter.
Recent Tweets
Sign Up for updates from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Blogroll
- Core Knowledge Blog
- Daniel Willingham: Science and Education Blog
- Education Next Blog
- Eduwonk
- Getting Smart
- Gotham Schools
- Intercepts
- Jay P. Greene
- Joanne Jacobs
- NACSA's Chartering Quality
- National Journal Education Blog
- NCTQ Pretty Darn Quick
- NCTQ Teacher Quality Bulletin
- Ohio Education Gadfly
- Politics K-12
- Quick and the Ed
- Rick Hess Straight Up
- The Corner
- The Hechinger Report
- Top Performers


