Hidden gems: America's exam schools
In a previous post, I lauded TBFI for digging into subjects that others have glossed over, typically due to a belief that we already have enough collective knowledge on the subject. Usually, the result is that Fordham reports unexpected findings that indicate how much more complicated and interesting the matter actually is.
But there’s another type of research TBFI pursues that I find even more valuable: the study of important stuff that most of us didn’t even know was out there.
For example, the Ohio team recently wrote about the challenges of student mobility; earlier, the national team looked at pension issues in charter schools, “private” public schools, and the red tape that affects school leaders. All of these are significant contributions to our understanding of under-examined corners of the K-12 world.
The recent product that best exemplifies this area of study is Finn and Hockett’s book on Exam Schools. I—like many of you, I suspect—knew that such schools existed. But I just never gave them much thought, and I certainly didn’t know how many there were, what they did, or what they meant for education reform more broadly.
But all that has changed, and I’m thankful for it. The authors not only give the informative descriptive statistics of this mini-sector of public education, they tease out invaluable lessons and implications.
I had no idea that there were so many of these schools or that they educated so many kids. I never realized that expanding this type of school would be an extremely wise national investment—a way to provide a world-class public education to high-performing students. I also didn’t know that many of these schools are serving large numbers of historically-disadvantaged students and getting great results.
I’m fascinated by how these schools fit in and don’t fit in to the larger systems of which they are technically a part. The way they enroll students—as well as how they are run, staffed, and governed—varies with each school, so there is no shared model, aside from the fact that they are quite different from the average neighborhood public school.
Many of us talk increasingly about “portfolio management,” a way to think about a city’s entire collection of schools and ways to ensure that new schools start, low-performing schools close, and so on.
I’m now convinced that we have to make sure exam schools are part of this conversation. While we strive to close the achievement gap, we have to make sure that we provide great options to high-performing kids, especially those in low-income neighborhoods who would otherwise have limited access to the opportunities these schools provide.
If you’re interested in urban education, portfolio management, or options for high-performing students, you really ought to give this book a read. It is a real eye-opener.
Category: Charters & Choice
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Editor
Michael J. Petrilli
Executive Vice President
Mike Petrilli is one of the nation's foremost education analysts. As executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, he oversees the organization's research projects and publications and contributes to the Flypaper blog and weekly Education Gadfly newsletter.
May 16, 2013
Sign Up for updates from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute
- Core Knowledge Blog
- Daniel Willingham: Science and Education Blog
- Education Next Blog
- Getting Smart
- Gotham Schools
- Jay P. Greene
- Joanne Jacobs
- NACSA's Chartering Quality
- National Journal Education Blog
- NCTQ Pretty Darn Quick
- NCTQ Teacher Quality Bulletin
- Ohio Education Gadfly
- Politics K-12
- Quick and the Ed
- Rick Hess Straight Up
- The Corner
- The Hechinger Report
- Top Performers