Education Gadfly Weekly

Volume 7, Number 15

April 19, 2007

Opinion + Analysis


How to improve Reading First
By G. Reid Lyon


Go clean


Rescue 911


Have mercy!


Viva la school trip!

Gadfly Studios


I know it was you, Fredo
This week, Mike and Rick talk about supes, Catholics, and Cubans. We've got an interview with Jonas Chartock of the Charter School Policy Institute, and Education News of the Weird is one with the people.

How to improve Reading First

G. Reid Lyon / April 19, 2007

Tomorrow, the House Education and Labor Committee will hold a hearing to consider the future of the much-discussed Reading First program, a key component of NCLB. While the hearing's title promises a focus on alleged "mismanagement and conflicts of interest" within the program, members of Congress would be better advised to concentrate on the future of federal policy in the domain of primary reading.

To consider the future, we're always well advised to start with a bit of history. Where did Reading First come from?

It came, above all, from mounting concern with the educational plight of far too many of our children. Despite honorable intentions, for years our governments, our educators, our media, and our scientists have been letting down kids, particularly poor kids and their families. When over 50 percent of underprivileged children keep failing in school and dropping out, something is not working.

Any effort to address that problem must begin with reading. An enormous proportion of young Americans cannot read well enough to learn about history, math, or science. Most such kids come from disadvantaged environments and many of their parents cannot read, either. Yet when it comes to educating these children, we continue to engage in practices and programs that have had no discernible effect on improving their reading capabilities.

For far too many years, the mainstays of instructional practices were superstition, tradition, and untested assumptions about how kids learn to read. Scientific

» Continued


How to improve Reading First

Go clean

April 19, 2007

Noam Scheiber, senior editor at The New Republic, is none too pleased about what he calls the "cleverness problem" bedeviling top economic graduate schools. According to him, today's students and professors are far less interested in using the dismal science to investigate important issues (poverty, inequality, etc.) than in finding cute, clever ways to show causation between situations that have little or no practical consequence.

Demonstrating compelling causation--called clean identifying--is the holy grail of economic studies. And Scheiber isn't necessarily against it. He thinks clean identifying is well and good when applied to areas that deserve study (he gives as an example this paper about the correlation between education and future wages). But he also thinks the clean identification fetish for showing causation between unimportant, everyday occurrences has gone too far. Freakonomics might be to blame.  

He's correct in a sense. The economics that garners headlines is that of the "cute" variety. Does it really matter if diplomats' parking tickets are correlated to their country's level of corruption (see here), or that Mexican men pay prostitutes a premium for unprotected sex (see here)? Economists are supposed to be solving problems, not noting largely worthless causations. 

But in another sense, Scheiber gets it wrong, as noted by MIT economics professor Joshua Angrist. Angrist, who coauthored the aforementioned study of education's correlation to earnings, writes that he is "especially pleased when

» Continued


Go clean

Rescue 911

April 19, 2007

Education reformers have long argued that school choice is already widespread--among the well-to-do. Foes counter that choice programs are nothing but a "life raft" to save a few while letting the ship sink. Here's a new twist: St. Louis firefighters--union members all--are steamed that state law requires them to reside in the city of their employ. With its public schools in turmoil (see here), these men and women in uniform want a life raft of their own, namely the right to move to the suburbs and take advantage of their good public schools. "I'd be living out in Fenton and sending my kids to one of the best school districts in Missouri--and not paying for it," one of the firefighters explained. Fanning the flames is a 2005 decision allowing veteran police officers to escape from city to county schools. We're all for educational freedom, so give the firefighters what they want. But how unjust if the same state legislature that recently rejected school vouchers for the city's neediest families gives the green light to this form of school choice for city employees. What's good for the rescuers is also good for those who need rescuing.

"St. Louis firefighters are battling city schools," by Jake Wagman, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, April 17, 2007

» Continued


Rescue 911

Have mercy!

April 19, 2007

A couple months ago, it looked like the Boston Archdiocese was actively cooperating with charter schools. No more. With enrollment in Catholic schools flagging (in part because charters are tuition free), Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley decided to take off the gloves. The Archdiocese now refuses to lease or sell school facilities to charters. Among the victims is high-achieving Boston Collegiate Charter School, which had been in negotiations to buy a church-owned building. That's over. To his credit, however, O'Malley isn't simply making life difficult for charters. He has also enlisted top business leaders to raise money for Boston-area parochial schools and is working to make those schools more efficient. Competition, we're confident, is a good thing. If the Catholic schools are able to pull off a, err, ahem, reformation, it's apt to benefit needy kids.

"The church vs. charters," by Steve Bailey, Boston Globe, April 13, 2007

» Continued


Have mercy!

Viva la school trip!

April 19, 2007

Manhattan's Upper West Side may be the most liberal neighborhood in the United States. So who's surprised that a public school there wanted to show kids real Communism, up close and in-person? In 2004 and 2005, students from the area's Beacon School took school-led field trips to Cuba, in violation of federal law. This year, the New York City Education Department found out about this unapproved shuttle diplomacy and forbade a 2007 visit. But the school went to Havana anyway. New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg and Schools Chancellor Joel Klein have placed the matter under investigation. Klein told reporters, "It shouldn't have happened. We expressly said no." But New York Lieutenant Governor David Patterson, whose stepdaughter went on the 2005 trip, was less condemnatory. Describing the visit, during which students, among other things, interviewed a 15-year-old prostitute, Patterson said, "I've probably learned more, hearing about her experiences, than I have been able to read in books or watch in films about the Communist dictatorship." Then he reclined in his chair, lit a Cohiba, and returned to his game of dominos. 

"Manhattan School Challenges U.S. Rules and Sends Students on a Spring Break Trip to Cuba," by David M. Herszenhorn, New York Times, April 17, 2007

» Continued


Viva la school trip!

Closing the Expectations Gap 2007

Chester E. Finn, Jr. / April 19, 2007

 

Achieve, Inc.
April 2007

Achieve, Inc. deserves kudos for this "second annual" survey of states' progress "on the alignment of high school policies with the demands of college and work," an outgrowth of the American Diploma Project and the 2005 high school summit. But applaud softly, please, because the data presented here don't show huge progress and some of them indicate progress in directions that may not bear scrutiny. Get beyond the executive summary and you will encounter glum news about how few states are really aligning their high school exit and college entrance expectations (in the sense of common "cut scores," not shared aspirational standards); how few have continuous data systems that bridge the K-12 to postsecondary divide; how few hold their high schools to account for the subsequent performance of their graduates; and more. Consider, for example, that in just one of fifty states (New York) do "postsecondary institutions find the state's end-of-course high school tests... challenging enough to determine whether incoming students are prepared to enroll in credit-bearing courses." Yes I know, it's barely two years since the summit--but it's 24 years since A Nation at Risk, which cast most of its recommendations in terms of beefing up high school expectations and (vaguely) linking them to college requirements. Achieve does good work and we at Fordham are proud of our affiliation with the American Diploma Project, but the evidence presented in this report suggests mighty slow progress by states in long-overdue

» Continued


Closing the Expectations Gap 2007

Beating the Odds VII, An Analysis of Student Performance and Achievement Gaps on State Assessments, Results from the 2005-2006 School Year

Coby Loup / April 19, 2007

Council of the Great City Schools
April 2007

The hopeful tone of this latest installment of Beating the Odds is much the same as it's been the last six years. Once again we learn that the country's 66 Great City School districts are raising achievement levels while narrowing achievement gaps. This year's highlights: the percentages of fourth- and eight-graders at or above "proficient" in math and reading have all jumped by at least 8 percentage points and as much as 15 points since 2002. About half of the GCS districts reduced achievement gaps for poor and minority eighth-graders in math and reading; between 60 and 75 percent did so for fourth-graders. Unfortunately, like its predecessors, this report also points out that most urban districts still score below statewide averages in all areas. And the authors preface their findings with numerous important caveats, such as non-comparability of state assessments and the impossibility of testing for statistical significance due to lack of data. (We'd add another one: it's possible that the state assessments themselves are getting easier, which might help to explain these rosy findings.) Still, the authors point out that "the overall direction of the state numbers is corroborated by the most recent estimates from the National Assessment of Education Progress." And they're optimistic that states and cities will continue to improve their reporting systems. The ever-increasing volume of the city-by-city data and individual city profiles (the sections are so large

» Continued


Beating the Odds VII, An Analysis of Student Performance and Achievement Gaps on State Assessments, Results from the 2005-2006 School Year

America, The Last Best Hope

Chester E. Finn, Jr. / April 19, 2007

Volume II, From a World at War to the Triumph of Freedom
William J. Bennett
Thomas Nelson Publishers
2007

Volume II of Bill Bennett's fine U.S. history is out this week. Clocking in at almost 600 pages, it recounts the country's saga from World War I through Ronald Reagan. As Aspen Institute president Walter Isaacson (himself the author of a swell new biography of Einstein) says on the dust jacket, "Bill Bennett's wonderfully readable book...puts our nation's triumphs, along with its lapses, into the context of a narrative about the progress of freedom." This is not only an excellent work for anyone wanting deeper familiarity with American history--it (together with volume I, which Thomas Nelson published last year) would also be a superb textbook for an ambitious high school or college course.

» Continued


America, The Last Best Hope

Announcements

March 25: AEI Common Core Event

March 21, 2013

While most discussion about the Common Core State Standards Initiative has focused on its technical merits, its ability to facilitate innovation, or the challenges facing its practical implementation, there has been little talk of how the standards fit in the larger reform ecosystem. At this AEI conference, a set of distinguished panelists will present the results of their research and thoughts on this topic and provide actionable responses to the questions that will mark the next phase of Common Core implementation efforts. The event will take place at the American Enterprise Institute in D.C. on March 25, 2013, from 9:00AM to 5:00PM. It will also be live-streamed online. For more information and to register, click here.

Read more announcements

Archives



  

Please leave this field empty

Gadfly Podcast

National