Education Gadfly Weekly

Volume 9, Number 11

March 26, 2009

Gadfly Studios


Talking in paragraphs
This week, Mike and Rick discuss Fordham's new voucher paper, the future of private school choice as a viable ed policy strategy, and whether students should be able to check off more than one box when listing their race. Then Amber explains the new RAND study of charter schools and Rate that Reform is infected with March Madness.

Vouchers and accountability, a sliding scale

Chester E. Finn, Jr. , Christine Campbell / March 26, 2009

As we write, the fate of the District of Columbia voucher initiative (a.k.a. Opportunity Scholarship Program) hangs in the balance. Ambiguous, ambivalent remarks from President Obama's camp and Secretary Duncan certainly haven't helped to secure its future and its Congressional and interest-group enemies seem bent on ending it--with a possible reprieve for current beneficiaries. Many are outraged, as we believe they should be, even as others look forward to playing taps. Perhaps the foremost question that has resonated through these debates is, "are voucher programs like this one a good use of taxpayer money?"

Programs such as D.C.'s are under assault from many directions in part because participating private schools haven't openly provided the information--the test scores, the graduation rates, and the financial data--to answer this question. The public is wearying of this lack of transparency and opponents are using that weariness to their advantage.

Take Wisconsin and our home state of Ohio, for example, which together provide vouchers for more than 30,000 students. In both states, Democratic governors are pushing new policies that would up the ante on "accountability" for private schools participating in the voucher programs. In Ohio, Governor Ted Strickland would require that every pupil in a participating private school sit for the state test, even if just a single student receives a state voucher. But is this the best way to liberate important information from participating private schools? We explore this issue in "When Private

» Continued


Vouchers and accountability, a sliding scale

New Mexico offers new hope for pension reform

Michael J. Petrilli / March 26, 2009

Conventional wisdom says that most states and school districts will make budget cuts in the most boneheaded manner possible: lay off their young teachers, eliminate art and music classes, decimate sports programs, and so forth. And evidence from the current recession indicates that this conventional wisdom is usually right. But as John Edwards might have said, it doesn't have to be that way.

Consider New Mexico, where legislators from both sides of the aisle are proposing commonsense changes to the state's pension systems in order to save money and respond to dismal market conditions. Under the reforms, public employees, teachers included, would have to work 30 years before becoming eligible for retirement (up from 25), would see a greater share of their paychecks go to the retirement fund, and would make larger contributions to the state's health care system for retirees.

"We just have to have a system where people work longer and contribute more for that system to make it fly," said the state's House Republican Leader, Tom Taylor. The Democratic sponsor of the bill went one step further: "If we don't do something to bring these plans into some sense of being funded completely, then I don't think the Legislature has any other option than to go to defined contribution plans--401(k)."

Those are fighting words to the unions, of course, which want Governor Bill Richardson to veto the measure. The head of

» Continued


New Mexico offers new hope for pension reform

Comprehending reading comp

March 26, 2009

What do outer space and Appalachia have in common? They're both topics that students could encounter in reading comprehension passages on typical state tests. And they illustrate E.D. Hirsch's big beef with such assessments: they mean to test students' reading abilities, but they really test students' knowledge on randomly-chosen topics. Hirsch complains in the Times that "Teachers can't prepare for the content of the tests and so they substitute practice exams and countless hours of instruction in comprehension strategies like 'finding the main idea.'" These strategies inevitably fail to boost reading achievement and waste time that could be used to develop children's vocabulary and knowledge. But there's a solution: reading tests tied to each state's content standards in literature, science, history, geography, and the arts. Of course, that won't work in many states, as their standards are so vague. Still, as Hirsch explains, "we need to move from teaching to the test to tests that are worth teaching to." In with passages about the Boston Tea party; out with those on the Mexican axolotl.

"Reading Test Dummies," E.D. Hirsch, New York Times, March 22, 2009

» Continued


Comprehending reading comp

No need for a voucher vigil

March 26, 2009

The Washington Post's Jay Mathews is ready to close the book on vouchers. While he supports them himself, he thinks "[t]his nation of public school backers just won't go for vouchers." But hold the eulogizing for just a sec. Simply because D.C.'s program is on the block doesn't mean there's not hope beyond the Beltway. Consider the growing ranks of African-American legislators who support school choice. In South Carolina, State Senator Robert Ford recently introduced a bill to give students tax credits or tuition grants. His rationale is who will benefit the most: poor African-American students who are stuck in failing schools. "Public education is hurting our kids," he explained. "All of us have been defending the system. It's time to stop. I'm not pussyfooting with this anymore." Wisconsin State Representative Jason Fields also continues to fight the unpopular fight in his state, as do several African-American legislators in Georgia. And who knows--maybe the right approach to accountability might attract even more support, or at least fend off attempts to strangle the movement. 

"Saying 'When' on D.C. School Voucher Program," by Jay Mathews, Washington Post, March 23, 2009

"Public money for private schools?," by Roddie Burris, Charlotte Observer, March 23, 2009

» Continued


No need for a voucher vigil

Big, fast, and stupid

March 26, 2009

When the federal government starts talking in billions, is it too much to ask that the money be well spent? Apparently so. In the rush to get funds out to states and districts ASAP, education stimulus dollars are being dispersed via a tangle of federal formulae. The result is that some districts in states like Wyoming, which face no budgetary woes, are getting larger checks than those in states like Utah, whose budgets are in the tank. "These formulas were the best vehicle for getting these emergency economic recovery funds out to school districts as quickly as possible, to help them immediately stave off layoffs," explained a spokeswoman for Representative George Miller. The Administration doesn't see much of a problem, either. "In this case, people are just extraordinarily thankful for these unprecedented resources," explained Secretary Duncan. "So I'm aware of these disparities, but we've received zero complaints." No kidding! Keep in mind that the Secretary speaks mostly to educators. We suspect that if he conversed with taxpayers who are themselves "under water," he might spot some concerns about bailing out school districts that are just doing just fine.

"Some Rich Districts Get Richer as Aid is Rushed to Schools," by Sam Dillon, New York Times, March 22, 2009

» Continued


Big, fast, and stupid

Tattled-on teachers

March 26, 2009

If it's sensational, it'll sell papers. That's the motto of most periodicals and the tack the New York Post was surely taking with this subhead: "Teachers watched porn on work computers, falsified records to pad their pockets, faked doctors' notes to go on vacation." The New York Department of Education received 2,886 misconduct accusations last year--the most ever. There was the substitute teacher who showed his class a soft porn video featuring himself, the teacher who took an unauthorized field trip to Cambridge and sent the students back on the bus alone, and the teacher who called in sick for a week to attend the Berlin Film Festival. Of 725 accusations probed, Special Commissioner of Investigation Richard Condon says 327 were substantiated--and almost all of the whistle-blowing came from teachers themselves. In a system with 140,000 employees, it's no surprise that there are a few (hundred) bad apples. But their brazenness is more than a little remarkable.

"More Teachers are Misbehaving," by Susan Edelman and Melissa Klein, New York Post, March 22, 2009

» Continued


Tattled-on teachers

Charter Schools in Eight States: Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration, and Competition

Amber M. Winkler, Ph.D. / March 26, 2009

Ron Zimmer, Brian Gill, Kevin Booker, Stephane Lavertu, Tim Sass, and John Witte
RAND Education
March 2009

This longitudinal study seeks to answer four questions: What are the characteristics of students transferring to charter schools? What effect do charter schools have on test-score gains for students who transfer in from traditional public schools (TPSs), and vice versa? What is the effect of attending a charter high school on the probability of graduating and entering college? And what effect does the introduction of charter schools have on test scores of students in nearby TPSs? Though there are 8 states represented in the dataset, the actual data used are drawn from three states (Florida, Ohio, and Texas) and five large urban districts (Chicago, Denver, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and San Diego). The findings are a mixed bag. For example, charter schools, for the most part, don't "skim off" the highest-achieving students but also don't tend to perform any better than TPSs (although performance does improve with the longevity of the school, as one would expect). To look at graduation rates, researchers focused on Florida and Chicago; in those two locales, there was a positive relationship between attendance at a charter middle school and the likelihood of graduating and enrolling in college. Finally, they found that charters have little competitive effects on nearby TPSs. In other words, their presence in the vicinity is unlikely to improve the quality of the TPS. While the study evaluated elementary,

» Continued


Charter Schools in Eight States: Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration, and Competition

The Role of Research in Educational Improvement

Christina Hentges / March 26, 2009

John D. Bransford, Deborah J. Stipek, Nancy J. Vye, Louis M. Gomez, and Diana Lam, eds.
Harvard Education Press
February 2009

It's the age-old quandary of education research: how can interested parties connect high-level, oft-technical, and frequently dense academic research to the everyday work of teachers and schools?  This book is dedicated to understanding the relationship between education research and classroom practices, both in terms of how the two cultures communicate and the methodological and content issues faced by research. To segue from research to classroom and back, authors explore the roles of grant makers, state policymakers, school district administrators, and non-profit and for-profit education support organizations. Although each of these entities is important to disseminating and informing research, they rarely work together. What to do? Perhaps take a lesson from Japan, a country that apparently has done better at integrating research and practice. In a chapter about the Land of the Rising Sun, author Hidenori Fujita explores the mechanisms that allow research and teacher training to interact. It seems that closer relationships among the central government, education scholars, and classroom teachers allow for more fluid interaction between them and for "Japan [to] maintain an effective education system that functions as a learning organization." But the Japanese case may be inspiring in more than one way. Not only do practitioners and researchers communicate along well-oiled channels, but educational research in Japan is governed by a set of strict methodological protocols that

» Continued


The Role of Research in Educational Improvement

Successful Single-Sex Classrooms: A Practical Guide to Teaching Boys & Girls Separately

Stafford Palmieri / March 26, 2009

Michael Gurian, Kathy Stevens, and Peggy Daniels
Jossey-Bass Publishing
2009

Single-sex education has garnered more attention recently (see here, for example), now that the U.S. Department of Education has published regulations making it legally viable, and as districts seek new ways to boost achievement and provide alternatives to parents. This handbook for administrators and teachers (and even the casual parent or wonk) is a great place to learn more. It looks at everything from the developmental stages of the sexes to practical teaching strategies for girls-only or boys-only lessons. As everybody knows, boys tend to develop more slowly than girls, meaning that Johnny may find a task much more difficult than Sally at age 6 or 7, which could lead Johnny to become frustrated and alienated in school. This negative attitude, explain the authors, only deepens as he ages. Perhaps he would fare better in classes attuned to boys only. For their part, girls are most apt to benefit from single-sex education in middle school, when they start feeling self-conscious about themselves, their friendships, and their appearance, especially in front of boys. Girls may often dumb themselves down so as not to appear too smart in front of boys. Switching to an all-girls classroom can ease those stresses. Readers will also find helpful guidelines on the mechanics of switching a school from co-ed to single-sex, getting parent buy-in, and advertising strategies to attract students. The authors make no secret of

» Continued


Successful Single-Sex Classrooms: A Practical Guide to Teaching Boys & Girls Separately

Announcements

March 25: AEI Common Core Event

March 21, 2013

While most discussion about the Common Core State Standards Initiative has focused on its technical merits, its ability to facilitate innovation, or the challenges facing its practical implementation, there has been little talk of how the standards fit in the larger reform ecosystem. At this AEI conference, a set of distinguished panelists will present the results of their research and thoughts on this topic and provide actionable responses to the questions that will mark the next phase of Common Core implementation efforts. The event will take place at the American Enterprise Institute in D.C. on March 25, 2013, from 9:00AM to 5:00PM. It will also be live-streamed online. For more information and to register, click here.

Read more announcements

Archives



  

Please leave this field empty

Gadfly Podcast

National