Mapping State Proficiency Standards onto the NAEP Scales: Variation and Change in State Standards for Reading and Mathematics, 2005-2009

 

Mapping State Proficiency Standards onto the NAEP Scales coverThe variance between states’ proficiency cut
scores has been reported ad nauseum
over the past half-decade (we ourselves have weighed
in
on this issue more
than once
). Stepping into this clogged space is this NCES mapping study,
which compares 2009 state and NAEP proficiency standards for fourth- and
eighth-grade reading and math. (NCES did similar comparisons in 2009
and 2007.)
The overall numbers remain sobering—in 2008-09, no state set its proficiency
rate for fourth- or eighth-grade reading any higher than the “basic” level of
the NAEP; only one state—Massachusetts—set its grade four and eight math
proficiency rates at this level. Further, fully thirty-five states’ cut scores
were set at “below basic” NAEP standards in 2009. Yet there are some positives
to report. The majority of states that made changes to their testing systems
between 2007 and 2009 actually moved to more rigorous proficiency standards: In
reading, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and West Virginia
all dramatically upped their cut scores. In math, Mississippi, New Jersey,
Oklahoma, and West Virginia did so. And those states that saw a slackening in standards rigor (like South Carolina) were
probably right to do so—they had cut scores upwards of forty-five points above
the national average in some cases. As states move toward implementation of the
Common Core standards, policymakers should take note of this (albeit slow)
leveling of proficiency cut scores.

Click to play

Click to listen to commentary on Duncan's waivers from the Education Gadfly Show podcast

 

Victor Bandeira de Mello, Charles Blankenship,
and Don McLaughlin, “Mapping
State Proficiency Standards onto the NAEP Scales: Variation and Change in State
Standards for Reading and Mathematics, 2005-2009
,” (Washington, D.C.:,
August 2011).

More By Author