Posted on April 23, 2008 at 10:39 am by Liam Julian

How high can we go?

One of Thomas Sowell’s points, that college education is being watered down because too many people are obtaining it, is a fine one. He notes that “education is not a Good Thing categorically in unlimited amounts, for people of all levels of ability, interest, and willingness to work.” This is one reason why k-12’s current “college or nothing” structure is a failure, and why so many 16-, 17-, and 18-year-olds who are not willing to work toward college, and who have no other educational routes open to them, drop out of high school. (It’s not popular to say, but common sense helps us realize that if the almost-adult student likes fixing cars and hates poetry, one does him no service through repeated floggings of Marlowe.)    

Sowell writes:

Those who are not serious—which includes a remarkably large number of students, even at good colleges—would have to back off and go face the realities of the adult world in the job market. But not as many jobs would be able to require college degrees if such degrees were no longer so readily available at someone else’s expense.

His last sentence is a wounded antelope for the China-and-India crowd, which will instinctively pounce. They reflexively remind us that Americans compete not only with themselves but with (you know) the college-educated Chinese, Indians, Brazilians, Malagasy. Partly true, as always. But that U.S. education credentials are worth less each year is undeniable—and employers know it. As we push unqualified people into college, college degrees lose value. Today, having a B.A. is better than not having a B.A., but it won’t turn anyone’s head. In 20 years, one foresees the education Pooh-Bahs kvetching that too many low-income students lack three Master’s degrees. K-12 education is dismal as ever, yet universities are packed. What does that tell us?

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Comments

  1. Corey:

    Hmm. I often worry about this, but I’m not sure that the situation is quite as you describe it. The percentage of 25-29 year olds with at least a bachelor’s degree has stayed right around 28% for the last decade. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d06/tables/dt06_008.asp?referrer=list

  2. Liam Julian:

    As I read the chart you provide, the percentage has actually increased steadily over the last decade. What am I missing?

  3. Stephanie:

    I think this an excellent point (although I wouldn’t expect anything less from Sowell). In Britain they are already feeling the effects of a society where more and more kids graduate from high school and attend colleges. Last year they were reporting substantial shortages of tradesmen (and women) because the education system there is also one that pushes kids to go to college instead of taking an apprenticeship and learning a trade. The result is a shortage in crucial fields, such as electricians, plumbers, mechanics, ect. Society is as much to blame as the education system in this instance, as we live in a world where there is a certain stigma attached to people without a college degree.

  4. Corey:

    The percentage of people over 25 steadily increases (which, admittedly, kind of proves your point) but the percentage of people 25-29 does not — indicating that the first number won’t continue to increase forever at our current rate. I was really surprised when I saw this. It’s the third column, second bold-faced heading down (males and females, 25-29) — 27.8% in 1997 and 28.4% in 2006.

    Sorry for the immensely confusing chart.

  5. Liam Julian:

    Got it, thanks.

Leave a Reply