I’ve always wanted to have a neighbor just like you...
Yesterday, on the Wall Street Journal’s expanded opinion pages, Alan Ehrenhalt reviewed Bill Bishop’s new book, The Big Sort. Its thesis:
As Americans have moved over the past three decades, they have clustered in communities of sameness, among people with similar ways of life, beliefs and in the end, politics.
Both men are concerned about this trend, representing as they think it does a decline in interaction among people of differing views. I see the results of this trend where I live in Takoma Park, Maryland, known as the Berkeley of the Washington, D.C., region. (In October 2004, a college kid in a DNC t-shirt almost fainted when he asked me to donate to “get that bum out of office” and I told him I was actually in the Bush Administration. “I haven’t even come across another Republican,” he replied.)
And I agree that this development isn’t great for civic discourse or, ultimately, our democracy. But it might not be so bad for our schools. After all, one of the primary motivations of the school choice movement (which I support) is the ability for parents to sort themselves into schools that match their own personal beliefs about what good education looks like. More conservative parents can get a back-to-basics school and more progressive parents can get something more along the Montessori model. Nobody has to compromise toward a mushy middle.
As geographic sorting occurs, neighborhood public schools will have the same ability to customize themselves to fit the values of the local community. Particularly if all schools work toward common statewide academic standards, and thus have some degree of sameness when it comes to the content of what kids are learning, allowing them to differentiate when it comes to their approaches to discipline, school culture, the celebration of holidays, extra-curricular activities, etc., doesn’t seem like such a tragedy. And if my wife and I, as parents, don’t like the trendy, eco-friendly, ultra-PC ethos of my local Takoma Park school (we have another 4 ½ years to decide), then we can always, well, move.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
April 23rd, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Your last sentence is fine ... assuming you can actually afford to move from your current neighborhood into a neighborhood that offers the kind of education you want for your child. Otherwise, you’re stuck. And if you’re stuck in a low-income area, the chances that you’ll have some of the best teachers and/or school conditions for your child might be pretty slim. So I still see a problem with this ...
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:14 pm
More conservative parents can get a back-to-basics school and more progressive parents can get something more along the Montessori model. Nobody has to compromise toward a mushy middle.
oh, boy
I live in Westchester County, a place riddled with tiny little school districts, most of them extremely well-funded, living shoulder to shoulder.
All of these school districts are required, by law, to hire graduates of ed schools. And all of these school districts practice loose coupling. Superintendents do what they do, unhindered by critical school board members, unhappy parents, or the broader taxpaying public.
There are no back-to-basics public schools in Westchester.
There are no Montessori public schools in Westchester. (exception: Scarsdale has an alternative high school)
There are plenty of parents who want these things, but nobody’s getting them.