Posted on May 8, 2008 at 10:00 am by Liam Julian

Novak on Ayers

Mike has been all over the connection between Obama and Bill Ayers. Today, Bob Novak is on it, too; he thinks that Obama, who called the terrorist-sympathizing, America-hating Ayers just “a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” will have to offer voters a more thorough explication than that.

Obama supporters should hope any such explication is better than the one put forth by Stanley Fish, law professor and New York Times blogger, who justified his own association with Ayers by noting that people should not be held accountable for the actions of their acquaintances. That’s baloney. It’s also shockingly relativistic. It also won’t convince voters in Ohio. It also violates what everyone’s mother told him in first grade.

And while the sins of Ayers’s past are disturbing, so are his present sins—i.e., the drivel that he continues to publish and proffer. In one of his latest blog posts, for example, Ayers suggests that teachers structure their lesson plans to encourage the ideas in Whitman’s Leaves of Grass, such as “love the sun and the earth and the animals, despise riches, give alms to anyone who asks... dismiss whatever insults your soul,” etc. Ugh.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Comments

  1. Nate Stearns:

    I’m sorry. Is Obama supposed to spit on Ayers to make people happy? This is really the best you can come up with?

    Also, is it really so bad to 1) teach Whitman 2) encourage the ideas of loving the sun and the earth, etc...Is it the despise riches part you don’t like? Too socialistic? Or is it the dismiss whatever insults your soul? Too peremptory?

    Would it be any different than condemning McCain for the bizarre sermons of Rev. Hagee? Would you really want to be judged not only by what you do but by what anyone you’ve ever know has done?

Leave a Reply