Sign Up for updates from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Implementing Common Core
We push for rigorous standards and assessments in all core subjects; for school ratings and performance goals that stress getting students to be college and/or work-ready; for interventions in failing schools and dysfunctional districts that are likely to yield positive results; and for results-based accountability at every level of the system, including individual students and teachers.
Standards Central
Standards Central is a one-stop-shop for all of Fordham's recent reviews of state, national, and international curriculum and testing standards. This online clearinghouse presents a wealth of information about individual states’ academic standards, the Common Core State Standards, and various national and international assessment frameworks and standards. The Fordham Institute’s Standards Central includes a Best in Class page highlighting states with the strongest standards in English language arts (ELA), math, and U.S. history.
Recent Publications
The State of State Science Standards 2012
January 31, 2012
State reviews by Lawrence S. Lerner, Ursula Goodenough, John Lynch, Martha Schwartz, and Richard Schwartz Foreword by Chester E. Finn, Jr., and Kathleen Porter-Magee
NAEP review by Paul R. Gross
American science performance is lagging as the economy becomes increasingly high tech, but our current science standards are doing little to solve the problem. Explore all the state report cards and see how your state performed.
The Accountability Plateau
Mark Schneider / December 15, 2011
With the tenth anniversary of NCLB fast approaching, that law’s legacy continues to be fiercely contested. This new analysis of NAEP scores—focusing on Texas and on the entire nation—by former NCES commissioner Mark Schneider finds that solid gains in math achievement coincided with the advent of "consequential accountability," first in the trailblazing Lone Star State and a few other pioneer states, then across the land with the implementation of NCLB. But Schneider warns that the recent plateau in Texas math scores may foreshadow a coming stagnation in the country’s performance. Has the testing-and-accountability movement as we know it run out of steam? How else might we rekindle our nation’s education progress?
Review of the National Research Council's Framework for K-12 Science Education
Paul Gross / October 4, 2011
Representatives from twenty states are hard at work developing Next Generation Science Standards--and using as their starting point the National Research Council???s recently released Framework for K-12 Science Education. This new review of that framework, by Paul R. Gross, applauds its content but warns that it could wind up sending standards writers off track. This appraisal find much to praise in the Framework but also raises important concerns about a document that may significantly shape K-12 science education in the U.S. for years to come. Download to learn more.
Recent Articles
Common Core Watch
No love for Common Core? Why Tom misses the mark with his critique
February 17, 2012
Standards—no matter how clear or how rigorous—are not a panacea.
Education Gadfly Weekly
College Board: AP Report to the Nation
February 16, 2012
Digital learning gets shirked
Flypaper
The Buckeye State has been busy
February 16, 2012
Catch up on all the Fordham Ohio team's work.
Common Core Watch
Send in the clowns: Common Core implementation advice just keeps getting worse
February 15, 2012
When it comes to organizations peddling Common Core implementation resources and strategies, the buyer should beware.
Board’s Eye View
Education malfeasance: the “reading to learn” myth
February 11, 2012
The problem with our current approach to teaching literacy.





