Education Gadfly Weekly

May 16, 2013

  

Please leave this field empty

Gadfly Podcast

National

         

Ohio

       

Rethinking Governance

This ambitious strand of work freshly examines the basic structures of public education, seeking ways to make them work better and boost the impact and durability of choice- and standards-based reforms. We’re ready to rethink education managment, school boards, and districts; America’s traditional notions of education federalism and local control; and the barriers that discourage innovation, thwart change, and place entrenched adult interests ahead of children’s.

Recent Publications

Half empty or half full: Superintendents' views on Ohio's education reforms

May 16, 2013

This report is based on the responses to an online survey conducted in Spring 2013 with 344 school district superintendents in Ohio. The survey covered seven education policies, specifically: Common Core State Standards, teacher evaluations, the Third Grade Reading Guarantee, open enrollment, A-to-F ratings for schools and districts, individualized learning (blended learning and credit flexibility), and school choice (charter schools and vouchers). It also included several questions on general attitudes towards school reform in Ohio and two trend items. Download today to discover the key findings!

Redefining the School District in Tennessee

Nelson Smith / April 23, 2013

As the challenges of education governance loom ever larger and the dysfunction and incapacity of the traditional K-12 system reveal themselves as major roadblocks to urgently-needed reforms across that system, many have asked, “What’s the alternative?”

Governance in the charter school sector: Time for a reboot

yes Adam Emerson / March 28, 2013

When charter schools first emerged more than two decades ago, they presented an innovation in public school governance. No longer would school districts enjoy the “exclusive franchise” to own and operate public schools, as chartering pioneer and advocate Ted Kolderie explained. Charters wouldn’t gain all of the independence of private schools—they would still report to a publicly accountable body, or authorizer—but they would be largely freed from the micromanagement of school boards, district bureaucracies, and union contracts. Autonomy, in exchange for accountability, would reign supreme. Over the course of its twenty-year history, however, American education and its charter school sector have evolved in important ways. One of the significant ways is school governance—not a topic that gets a lot of attention but, as it turns out, a crucial one that is overdue for an overhaul (and not just in the charter sector). The growth of nonprofit charter networks (CMOs), the ubiquity of for-profit school-management companies (EMOs), and the emergence of “virtual” charter schools have all upended the notion that charters would mostly be freestanding “community-based” schools of the “one-off” variety. Yet the public policies and practices that characterize charter governance haven’t kept pace with these real-world changes. To examine this mismatch more closely and consider how it might be set right, we interviewed nearly two dozen analysts, authorizers, board members, and practitioners with interest in and knowledge of charter schools. Not one of them felt that the inherited assumptions and regulations about governance in the charter sector are truly well suited to present-day realities. This brief explores several ways that charter governance might be rebooted.

Recent Articles

‘Twas the night before de-regulation

December 24, 2011
Why the free market belongs in education.

Zuckerberg 2.0: Cami Anderson and Newark

May 5, 2011

Zen and the art of school board maintenance

September 13, 2011

You???d be crazy to see SB5???s defeat as rejection of Ohio school reform

November 10, 2011
A vote of support for first responders

Yawning in Colorado

April 22, 2011